Skip to content

Psalms 35:12

Psalms 35:12
They rewarded me evil for good to the spoiling of my soul.

My Notes

What Does Psalms 35:12 Mean?

"They rewarded me evil for good to the spoiling of my soul." David describes the cruelest betrayal: he did good, and they returned evil. The exchange rate is devastating — good given, evil received. The asymmetry of the transaction spoils David's soul: the betrayal doesn't just hurt externally. It desolates internally.

The phrase "evil for good" (ra'ah tachath tovah — evil in place of good) describes a moral inversion: the standard exchange should be good for good (reciprocity) or at minimum, neutrality. Returning evil for good inverts the basic moral structure. The betrayal isn't just ingratitude. It's active moral reversal.

The "spoiling of my soul" (shekol lenaphshi — bereavement/childlessness to my soul) uses the language of a parent losing a child: the betrayal left David's soul as desolate as a bereaved parent. The evil-for-good exchange didn't just cause pain. It created the emptiness of profound loss. The soul has been orphaned by the betrayal.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Who has rewarded you evil for the good you gave — and have you named what it did to your soul?
  • 2.What's the difference between ingratitude and actively returning evil for good?
  • 3.How does the 'spoiling' (bereavement) language describe the depth of betrayal wounds?
  • 4.What does bringing this betrayal to God — naming it honestly — begin to heal?

Devotional

I gave them good. They gave me evil. And it desolated my soul. David describes the betrayal that leaves you empty: you poured your best into someone, and they returned their worst. The transaction should have been good for good. Instead it was evil for good. The math is morally bankrupt.

The 'evil for good' isn't just ingratitude — it's inversion: ingratitude is failing to return good. Evil for good is actively returning harm for help. It's the person you nursed through crisis who stabs you during your vulnerable moment. The one you poured into pours poison back. The reversal isn't passive forgetfulness. It's active betrayal.

The 'spoiling of my soul' — literally bereavement, the grief of a parent who lost a child — reveals the depth of the wound: this isn't hurt feelings. This is soul-devastation. The betrayal created the same emptiness that a mother feels when she loses her child. The soul is bereaved. The spirit is childless. The part of you that gave the good is now desolate because the good was returned as evil.

David brings this to God — he doesn't process it alone, doesn't rationalize it, doesn't minimize it. He names the transaction (evil for good) and names the damage (spoiling of my soul) and puts both before the Lord. The honest naming is part of the healing.

Who has rewarded you evil for good — and have you named the spoiling it caused to your soul?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

They rewarded me evil for good,.... For the good David did in killing Goliath, and slaying his ten thousands of the…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

They rewarded me evil for good - They recompensed, or returned evil instead of good. The manner in which they did it he…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Psalms 35:11-16

Two very wicked things David here lays to the charge of his enemies, to make good his appeal to God against them -…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

They rewarded&c. Better, as R.V., they reward. As in the preceding verse he speaks of what is still going on. His…